Hey guys!
I think I came up with a good idea for our review film!
It's set within a court trial that is trying to get to the bottom of a corporate crime committed within a covert office setting. The crime is the 'event' and the court trial is the platform for the discussion of the event leading to the crime (were they real or just staged? pure event or event?). Within the trial a key witness is called to the stand to implicate the defendant with the crime (is the defendent just a subject, therefore wothout value to the event, or is he the active person involved in the event?)
This sort of script can bring up all of the notions described in the book as they pertain to the Real vs. the Actual, subject vs. Individual(participant), pure-event vs. event, etc. The reason I thought of this is because I noticed that throughout the book the author makes references to analogies of detectives getting to the bottom of a crime scene to explain the philosophies. I found this helps me to understand and makes for an engaging way to explain the theories without making something too artsy and wierd. What do you all think?
let me know? And keep your eye out for these references while you're reading!
Later.
Friday, March 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
this sounds good, but we will have to change it a bit
Post a Comment